A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours above the construction of a wall at a coastal web page inside of a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated nationwide awareness adhering to an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of organizing breaches, environmental concerns, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Moments report about René Collier and also the Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a extremely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, look for to make their loved ones house. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being created by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted less than setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Road, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their scheduling permission by developing a wall further than the boundaries of their internet site, bringing about an encroachment on a Special Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such regions are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological outcomes, especially within a delicate coastal atmosphere for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct position. Their lawful staff has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The few accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their see, an allegation that has been recurring in court and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal setting up disputes, the place views of The ocean are equally highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary efforts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations, an image which has considering the fact that turn into emblematic from the intensity in the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Acquire Visible proof in the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Instances documented, describing how The 2 men entered the water in the course of intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm drinking water to photograph the website turned The most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that such steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into a location afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was staying encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were included intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second during the authorized timeline.
With the core of your dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain the wall, as built, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been called meticulous in his examination Paul Feely of setting up files, maps, and situations attached towards the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by worry for environmental safety and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it's about making certain that advancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have explained their lengthy-standing relationship to the world and their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few basically wanting to develop a family household in accordance Together with the law. They deny the wall encroaches on a Specific Area of Conservation and say that each one operates happen to be completed dependant on Specialist suggestions and approved strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean in the course of a storm, do not change the fundamental facts.
The case has also raised broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of design of wall at coastal website has grown to be a shorthand description for a scenario that lots of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Moments report about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on setting up and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from very distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from your sea Irish Moments coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Situations and René Collier waded as a result of waist-superior h2o during a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting both equally the Bodily truth in the coastline and also the symbolic nature on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an excessive strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome continues to be uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain whether or not the wall as crafted complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Special Location of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and setting up conditions. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another lengthy once the authorized expenditures happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building will work at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case prolong over and above that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre in the dispute stands partially crafted, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually finally be altered, taken off, or concluded as planned will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably continue on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more carefully watched planning disputes in north Dublin in recent times.