A bitter High Court dispute has broken out among future neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated national notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, resulting in an encroachment on a Distinctive Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore areas are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological implications, particularly inside of a sensitive coastal surroundings such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, which can be partially crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding so that you can preserve their perspective, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal preparing disputes, the place sights of the sea are the two remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular efforts via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Times write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that this sort of steps were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately from the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second within the legal timeline.
In the Main of your dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed Accountant Paul Feely that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to make a family household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved programs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions post about René Collier noted which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as designed complies with scheduling authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell along with each other long once the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation lengthen further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. What's more, it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre on the dispute stands partly developed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. No matter if it'll in the long run be altered, removed, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court’s results. Until eventually then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.